Fulham vs Manchester United: AI analysis
Analyses are for information only and do not guarantee any result.
AI probabilities
Confidence level
Moderate score: the signals point the same way but some indicators are missing or diverge. Read with caution.
Odds
Odds movement · 2 · MUN
Bookmaker odds for outcome 2 over 2 readings: from 2.00 to 2.00.
Expected goals
The match in goals
Goal expectations fitted to the final probabilities (1X2 and over/under 2.5), then turned into markets that are consistent with one another. The fair price has no margin: any higher price is value.
Most likely correct scores
Each cell shows the probability of that score (rows FUL, columns MUN). Beyond 5 goals per team: 0.9%.
Expected goals
Expected total: 3.2 goalsDerived markets
| Market | Probability | Fair odds |
|---|---|---|
| Over 1.5 goals | 84% | 1.19 |
| Over 2.5 goals | 62% | 1.62 |
| Under 2.5 goals | 38% | 2.60 |
| Over 3.5 goals | 39% | 2.54 |
| Both teams to score | 64% | 1.57 |
| FUL keep a clean sheet | 16% | 6.25 |
| MUN keep a clean sheet | 26% | 3.86 |
| FUL win by 2+ goals | 12% | 8.13 |
| MUN win by 2+ goals | 27% | 3.69 |
Market consensus versus team model
The corrected consensus is our reference probability. The team model (goals and shots on target, time weighted) is a second opinion.
6-point gap on Manchester United: the model is more cautious than the market. Across 4,806 tested matches, following the model against the market lost money. Read it as a lead for analysis, not as a bet.
Over / under 2.5 goals
| Market | Probability | Fair odds | Best odds | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over 2.5 goals | 61% | 1.63 | 1.58 | -3,0 % |
| Under 2.5 goals | 39% | 2.59 | 2.40 | -7,3 % |
Shots on target per game
- Fulham
- 4.0 for4.5 against
- Manchester United
- 5.5 for4.3 against
Data
Match statistics
The data used by the model. Unavailable data is shown as such, never replaced by an estimate.
Recent form
Key: W win, D draw, L loss. Last five matches, oldest to most recent.
Home / Away
- Fulham
- 0W 0D 2L at home
- Manchester United
- 0W 1D 1L away
Head-to-head
Last 4 meetings: 0 Fulham win(s), 1 draw(s), 3 Manchester United win(s)
Goals scored
Average per match.
Goals conceded
Average per match.
Expected goals (xG)
Data unavailable
Average xG per match.
Absentees
Data not available
AI analysis
What the model says
Prono Data probabilities: 27% for Fulham, 25% for the draw, 48% for Manchester United. They come from the bookmaker consensus with the margin removed and the favourite / longshot bias corrected: the best calibrated reference in our tests. Expected goals: 1.3 for Fulham, 1.8 for Manchester United. Most likely scores: 1-1 (12%), 1-2 (9%), 0-2 (7%). Over 2.5 goals at 62%, both teams to score at 64%. As a second opinion, our team model (goals and shots on target, time weighted) gives 29% / 29% / 41%. It differs from the market by 6 points on a Manchester United win (more cautious). Historically, when the two disagree, the market is right more often: we show it as a signal worth digging into, not as a bet. Recent form: Fulham W-L-L-L-D, 1.0 scored and 1.8 conceded per game, 4.0 shots on target; Manchester United W-L-W-D-L, 1.8 scored and 1.8 conceded, 5.5 shots on target. Last 4 meetings: 0 Fulham win(s), 1 draw(s), 3 Manchester United win(s). No price beats the fair price by at least 2.5%: no tracked bet on this match. The favourite is a Manchester United win.
Scenarios
Possible scenarios
- 1
Most likely scenario (48%): Manchester United control the game and win, in an open match with goals at both ends.
- 2
Draw scenario (25%): the two sides cancel each other out; an outcome not to dismiss.
- 3
Upset scenario (27%): Fulham capitalise on an early goal or a weak spell from Manchester United.
Compute my stake for this bet
The calculator will be pre-filled with odds of 2.05 and the 48 % probability of outcome 2 · MUN. You set your bankroll and strategy.
Analyses are for information only and do not guarantee any result.
Sports betting involves a risk of financial loss. For adults only.
View the public track record of all settled analyses.