Head-to-head
PrimeSportsFunded vs LetMeBet
PrimeSportsFunded and LetMeBet compared row by row on 16 criteria taken from our verified reviews. No estimated figures: when a data point is missing, the row stays empty.
PrimeSportsFunded
French prop firm, single-phase evaluation with no time limit, capital from 5 000 $ to 100 000 $.
LetMeBet
Two-phase evaluation at +20% each (30 days per phase), capital from 5 000 € to 100 000 €, the lowest entry prices in the comparison.
4 criteria for PrimeSportsFunded3 criteria for LetMeBet1 tie
On scored rows only (max or min). Informational criteria do not count.
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay.
Reviews verified on 13 September 2026Row by row
The head-to-head, criterion by criterion
Drawdown is the maximum tolerated loss: the wider the allowance, the more tolerant the rule. The target is the profit to reach: the lower it is, the less demanding the challenge.
Best value on the row
| Criterion | PrimeSportsFunded | LetMeBet |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.8 / 10 Best | 7.2 / 10 |
| Max capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 100 000 $US | 100 000 € |
| Min capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 5 000 $US | 5 000 € |
| Entry price | 109 € | 97 € Best |
| Profit target | +35 % | +20 % Best |
| Overall drawdown | -20 % Best | -15 % |
| Daily drawdown | -10 % Tie | -10 % |
| Evaluation phases | 1 phase Best | 2 phases |
| Challenge durationInformational criterion, not scored. | No time limit | 30 days per phase |
| Minimum betsInformational criterion, not scored. | 25 | 25 |
| Allowed stakeInformational criterion, not scored. | 2–5% of the capital | 1–10% of the bankroll |
| Profit split | 80–90 % Best | 80 % |
| Demo account | No | — |
| Capital currencyInformational criterion, not scored. | US dollar ($) | Euro (€) |
| Company countryInformational criterion, not scored. | France | Hong Kong |
| Trustpilot score | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 Best |
Overall score
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 7.8 / 10 Best
- LetMeBet
- 7.2 / 10
Max capital
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 100 000 $US
- LetMeBet
- 100 000 €
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Min capital
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 5 000 $US
- LetMeBet
- 5 000 €
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Entry price
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 109 €
- LetMeBet
- 97 € Best
Profit target
- PrimeSportsFunded
- +35 %
- LetMeBet
- +20 % Best
Overall drawdown
- PrimeSportsFunded
- -20 % Best
- LetMeBet
- -15 %
Daily drawdown
Tie- PrimeSportsFunded
- -10 %
- LetMeBet
- -10 %
Evaluation phases
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 1 phase Best
- LetMeBet
- 2 phases
Challenge duration
- PrimeSportsFunded
- No time limit
- LetMeBet
- 30 days per phase
Informational criterion, not scored.
Minimum bets
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 25
- LetMeBet
- 25
Informational criterion, not scored.
Allowed stake
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 2–5% of the capital
- LetMeBet
- 1–10% of the bankroll
Informational criterion, not scored.
Profit split
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 80–90 % Best
- LetMeBet
- 80 %
Demo account
- PrimeSportsFunded
- No
- LetMeBet
- —
Capital currency
- PrimeSportsFunded
- US dollar ($)
- LetMeBet
- Euro (€)
Informational criterion, not scored.
Company country
- PrimeSportsFunded
- France
- LetMeBet
- Hong Kong
Informational criterion, not scored.
Trustpilot score
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 4.2 / 5
- LetMeBet
- 4.5 / 5 Best
Respective strengths
What each platform does better
Where PrimeSportsFunded wins
- Overall score. Higher overall score: 7.8 / 10 vs 7.2 / 10
- Overall drawdown. More tolerant overall drawdown: -20 % vs -15 %
- Evaluation phases. Fewer evaluation phases: 1 phase vs 2 phases
- Profit split. More favourable profit split: 80–90 % vs 80 %
Where LetMeBet wins
- Entry price. Lower entry price: 97 € vs 109 €
- Profit target. Less demanding target: +20 % vs +35 %
- Trustpilot score. Higher Trustpilot score: 4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5
Our reading
PrimeSportsFunded or LetMeBet: which profile?
PrimeSportsFunded
PrimeSportsFunded may suit a bettor who values a higher overall score in our grid (7.8 / 10 vs 7.2 / 10), a wider overall loss allowance (-20 % vs -15 %), an evaluation with fewer steps (1 phase vs 2 phases) and a more favourable profit split (80–90 % vs 80 %).
LetMeBet
LetMeBet may suit a bettor who values a lower entry price (97 € vs 109 €), a less demanding profit target (+20 % vs +35 %) and a better Trustpilot score (4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5).
PrimeSportsFunded + LetMeBet
PrimeSportsFunded and LetMeBet share several identical rules: daily drawdown (-10 %) and minimum bets (25). The two platforms also differ on points we do not score: max capital (100 000 $US vs 100 000 €), min capital (5 000 $US vs 5 000 €), challenge duration (no time limit vs 30 days per phase), allowed stake (2–5% of the capital vs 1–10% of the bankroll), capital currency (US dollar ($) vs Euro (€)) and company country (France vs Hong Kong). In both cases the challenge is paid and failure remains possible: read each platform's full rules before buying.
Go further
Full reviews and tools
Frequently asked questions about PrimeSportsFunded vs LetMeBet
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay.